Editorial Policies

Focus and Scope



The SEAT Journal publishes original articles with the aim to advance our knowledge of theory and practice in science, education, art and technology.




The SEAT Journal welcomes any research papers on science, education, art and technology using techniques from and applications in any technical knowledge domain: original theoretical works, literature reviews, research reports, social issues, psychological issues, curricula, learning environments, and review articles. The articles should be original, unpublished, and not in consideration for publication elsewhere at the time of submission to the SEAT Journal.


Section Policies


Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed

Peer Review Process

The articles should be original, unpublished, and not in consideration for publication elsewhere at the time of submission to the SEAT Journal and during the review process. 

The SEAT Journal is a refereed journal and has a double-blind review. Any manuscript submitted for consideration in publication in the SEAT Journal is reviewed by at least two international reviewers with expertise in the relevant subject area.

Please consider that editor and reviewers invest significant time in the submission. Thus, the submission cannot be withdrawn without the approval of the editorial office during the review, the revision, the production after acceptance or publication process.


Publication Frequency

The Science, Education, Art and Technology Journal (SEAT Journal) is a peer-reviewed scholarly online journal. The SEAT Journal is published twice a year in Spring and Fall. The manuscripts which are accepted for publication in the SEAT Journal before Spring are published in the Spring issue. The manuscripts which are accepted for publication in the SEAT Journal before Fall are published in the Fall issue. 


Open Access Policy

This journal provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge.



This journal utilizes the LOCKSS system to create a distributed archiving system among participating libraries and permits those libraries to create permanent archives of the journal for purposes of preservation and restoration. More...


Editorial Board

Arturo Tobias Calizon, University of Perpetual Help System Dalta, Philippines

Ayfer Alper, Ankara University, Turkey

Ayşegül Alaybeyoğlu, İzmir Ekonomi University, Turkey

Cara Williams, Emirates College For Advanced Education, United Arab Emirates

Chris Plyley, University of the Virgin Islands, Virgin Islands

Claudiu Mereuta, Dunarea De Jos University of Galati, Romania

El Takach Suzanne, Lebanese University, Lebanon

Farouk Bouhadiba, University of Oran 2, Algeria

Hakan Akçay, Yıldız Teknik University, Turkey

Irena Markovska, Assen Zlatarov University, Bulgaria

Irina Andreeva, Peter The Great St. Petersburg Polytechnic University (SPBPU), Russia

Iwona Bodys-Cupak, Jagiellonian University, Poland

Jaya Bishnu Pradhan, Tribhuvan University, Nepal

Kassa Mickael, Addis Ababa University, Ethiopia

Kemmanat Mingsiritham, Sukhothai Thammathirat Open University, Thailand

Mehtap Yildirim, Marmara University, Turkey

Milan Kubiatko, University of Zilina, Slovakia

Muhammad Zayyad, Al-Qasemi Academic College of Education, Palestine

Munise Handan Güneş, Ondokuz Mayıs University, Turkey

Mustafa Koç, Süleyman Demirel University, Turkey

Oguz Akturk, Necmettin Erbakan University, Turkey

Philomina Ifeanyi Onwuka, Delta State University, Nigeria

Selahattin Alan, Selçuk University, Turkey

Sharif Abu Karsh, Arab American University, Palestine

Shenglei Pi, Guangzhou University, China

Siew Nyet Moi, Universiti Malaysia Sabah, Malaysia

Sinan Erten, Hacettepe University, Turkey

Sindorela Doli Kryeziu, University of Gjakova, Albania

Sugeng Sutiarso, University of Lampung, Indonesia

Tryfon Mavropalias, University of Western Macedonia, Greece

Volodymyr Sulyma, Dnipropetrovsk Medical Academy, Ukraine


Publication Ethics and Malpractice Statement

The Science, Education, Art and Technology Journal (SEAT Journal)’s Publication Ethics and Publication Malpractice Statement is based, in large part, on the guidelines and standards developed by the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE). The relevant duties and expectations of authors, reviewers, and editors of the journal are set out below.


Responsibilities of Authors


By submitting a manuscript to Science, Education, Art and Technology Journal (SEAT Journal), the author(s) warrant that the manuscript is their own, original work and that it has neither been published previously nor is currently being considered for publication elsewhere. They also warrant that the sources of any ideas and/or words in the manuscript that are not their own have been properly attributed through appropriate citations and/or quotes.


An author should not normally publish manuscripts describing essentially the same research in multiple journals or publication venues. Such redundant publication is generally considered to constitute unethical publishing behavior, and if discovered may result in a manuscript under consideration being rejected, or a published article being retracted.


Authors of manuscripts reporting on original research should present an accurate account of the work performed, accompanied by an objective discussion of its significance. Underlying data should be represented accurately in the manuscript. The manuscript should contain sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the work. The fabrication of results and the making of fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behavior and may be cause for rejection or retraction of a manuscript or published article.


Where the manuscript reports on commercial software, hardware, or other products, authors must include a declaration at the beginning of the manuscript in which they must either state that no conflict of interest exists or describe the nature of any potential conflict. All sources of financial support for the research should also be disclosed in the manuscript.


The author(s) of a manuscript agree that if the manuscript is accepted for publication in the Science, Education, Art and Technology Journal (SEAT Journal), the published article will be copyrighted using a Creative Commons “Attribution 4.0 International” license. This license allows others to freely copy, distribute, and display the copyrighted work, and derivative works based upon it, under certain specified conditions.


Authors are responsible for obtaining written permission to include any images or artwork for which they do not hold copyright in their articles, or to adapt any such images or artwork for inclusion in their articles. The copyright holder must be made explicitly aware that the image(s) or artwork will be made freely available online as part of the article under a Creative Commons “Attribution 4.0 International” license.


The authors’ names should be listed on the article in order of their contribution to the article, and all authors take responsibility for their own contributions. Only those individuals who have made a substantive contribution should be listed as authors; those whose contributions are indirect or marginal (e.g., colleagues or supervisors who have reviewed drafts of the work or provided proofreading assistance, and heads of research institutes/centers/labs) should be named in an “Acknowledgments” section at the end of the article, immediately preceding the Reference List. The corresponding author must ensure that all appropriate co-authors and no inappropriate co-authors are included on the article, and that all listed co-authors have seen and approved the final version of the article and agreed to its publication.


Where an author discovers a significant error or inaccuracy in an article of his/hers that has been published in the Science, Education, Art and Technology Journal (SEAT Journal), he/she has an obligation to promptly notify the editors and cooperate with them to correct the article or retract it as appropriate.


Responsibilities of Reviewers


The Science, Education, Art and Technology Journal (SEAT Journal)’s reviewers perform work for the journal on a volunteer basis. Given that most of these individuals are in full-time employment, their reviewing activities for the Science, Education, Art and Technology Journal (SEAT Journal) must, by necessity, not be their top priority. Reviewers are free to decline invitations to review particular manuscripts at their discretion, for example, if their current employment workload and/or other commitments make it prohibitive for them to complete a review in a timely fashion and to do justice to the task in the available time frame. They should also not accept manuscript review assignments for which they feel unqualified.


Reviewers who have accepted manuscript assignments are normally expected to submit their reviews within one month. They should recuse themselves from the assignment if it becomes apparent to them at any stage that they do not possess the required expertise to perform the review, or that they may have a potential conflict of interest in performing the review (e.g., one resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, institutions, or companies associated with the manuscript).


Privileged information or ideas obtained by reviewers through the peer review process must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents, and must not be shown to or discussed with others except as authorized by the Science, Education, Art and Technology Journal (SEAT Journal) Editor.


When conducting their reviews, reviewers are asked to do so as objectively as possible, refraining from engaging in personal criticism of the author(s). They are encouraged to express their views clearly, explaining and justifying all recommendations made. They should always attempt to provide detailed and constructive feedback to assist the author(s) in improving their work, even if the manuscript is, in their opinion, not publishable.


Reviewers should identify in their reviews relevant published work that has not been cited by the author(s), together with any instances in which proper attribution of sources has not been provided. They should call to the responsible editor’s attention any major resemblances between a manuscript under consideration and other published articles or papers of which they are aware, as well as any concerns they might have in relation to the ethical acceptability of the research reported in the manuscript.


Responsibilities of Editors


The Science, Education, Art and Technology Journal (SEAT Journal) has ultimate responsibility for deciding if a manuscript submitted to the Science, Education, Art and Technology Journal (SEAT Journal) should be published, and in doing so is guided by the journal’s policies as determined by the Science, Education, Art and Technology Journal (SEAT Journal) editorial board and constrained by such legal requirements as shall then be in force regarding libel, copyright infringement, and plagiarism. The Editor may consult with the Associate Editor and other members of the editorial team, as well as with reviewers, in making publication decisions.


The editors will evaluate manuscripts for their intellectual content without regard to the race, color, gender, sexual orientation, religious beliefs, ethnic origin, citizenship, or political philosophy of the author(s). They will not disclose any information about a manuscript under consideration to anyone other than the author(s), reviewers and potential reviewers, and in some instances the Science, Education, Art and Technology Journal (SEAT Journal) editorial board members, as appropriate. Additionally, the editors will make every effort to ensure the integrity of the blind review process by not revealing the identity of the author(s) of a manuscript to the reviewers of that manuscript, and vice versa.


When evaluating a manuscript for publication, in addition to considering standard criteria pertaining to the rigor of the manuscript, the quality of its presentation, and its contribution to humanity’s stock of knowledge, the editors will also seek evidence that ethical harms have been minimized in the conduct of the reported research. They will question whether the benefits outweigh the harms in the particular study’s case. Since the Science, Education, Art and Technology Journal (SEAT Journal) welcomes the submission of manuscripts from any country, it is necessary to recognize that laws and regulations regarding research ethics and ethical approval vary worldwide. As such, the editors may need to seek clarification in this regard with the author(s) and request that they supply a letter from the relevant institutional ethics committee or board that approved the research.


The editors will be guided by CORE’s Guidelines for Retracting Articles when considering retracting, issuing an expression of concern about, and issuing corrections pertaining to articles that have been published in the Science, Education, Art and Technology Journal (SEAT Journal). They are committed to working closely with research organizations and institutions in line with CORE’s advice on Cooperation between Research Institutions and Journals on Research Integrity Cases.



Indexes & Databases


Publication Fee

The SEAT Journal is a peer-reviewed scholarly online free journal. There is no publication fee.