Yayın Politikası

Odak ve Kapsam

Bilim, Eğitim, Sanat ve Teknoloji Dergisi (BEST Dergi); bilimsel ve hakemli bir dergi olarak yılda iki kez yayınlanmaktadır. BEST Dergi, Bahar ve Güz dönemlerinde yılda iki kez yayınlanmaktadır. Bahar döneminden önce BEST Dergi 'de yayınlanmak üzere kabul edilen makaleler Bahar döneminde yayınlanmaktadır. Güz döneminden önce BEST Dergi 'de yayınlanmak üzere kabul edilen makaleler Güz döneminde yayınlanmaktadır.

 

Bu dergide; bilim, eğitim, sanat veya teknoloji ile ilgili özgün kuramsal çalışmalar, literatür incelemeleri, araştırma raporları, sosyal konular, kitap incelemeleri ve araştırma makaleleri yayınlanmaktadır. Dergiye yayınlanmak üzere gönderilen makalelerin daha önce yayınlanmamış veya yayınlanmak üzere herhangi bir yere gönderilmemiş olması gerekmektedir. Makaleler; araştırma, öğretim ve özel çalışma amaçları için kullanılabilir. Herhangi bir formda, kısmi veya bütün olarak yeniden basımı kesinlikle yasaktır. Makalelerinin içeriğinden sadece yazarlar sorumludur. Dergi, makalelerin telif hakkına sahiptir. Yayıncı, araştırma materyalinin kullanımı ile ilgili olarak doğrudan veya dolaylı olarak ortaya çıkan herhangi bir kayıp, eylem, talep, işlem, maliyet veya zarardan sorumlu değildir.

 

Bölüm Politikaları

Makaleler

Seçilmiş Açık Başvurular Seçilmiş Dizinlenmiş Seçilmiş Hakem Değerlendirmesinden Geçmiş
 

Değerlendirme Süreci

Makaleler orijinal, yayınlanmamış olmalı ve BEST Dergi hakemlik süreci boyunca başka bir yerde yayınlanmak üzere değerlendirilmemelidir.

 

BEST Dergi hakemli bir dergidir. BEST Dergi’ye yayınlanmak üzere sunulan makaleler, ilgili konu alanında uzmanlık sahibi en az iki hakem tarafından incelenir.

 

Yayın Sıklığı

BEST Dergi, Bahar ve Güz dönemlerinde yılda iki kez yayınlanmaktadır. Bahar döneminden önce BEST Dergi 'de yayınlanmak üzere kabul edilen makaleler Bahar döneminde yayınlanmaktadır. Güz döneminden önce BEST Dergi 'de yayınlanmak üzere kabul edilen makaleler Güz döneminde yayınlanmaktadır.

 

Açık Erişim Politikası

Bu dergi açık erişim sağlama politikasını benimsemiştir. Açık erişim bilginin global değişimini artırarak insanlık için yararlı sonuçlar doğurmaktadır.

 

Arşivleme

Bu dergi, katılan kütüphanelerin koruma ve restorasyon amaçlı dağıtık kalıcı arşivler yaratmasına izin vermek için LOCKSS sistemi kullanmaktadır. LOCKSS sistemi konusunda daha fazla bilgi almak isterseniz.

 

Yayın Kurulu

Arturo Tobias Calizon, University of Perpetual Help System Dalta, Philippines

Ayfer Alper, Ankara University, Turkey

Ayşegül Alaybeyoğlu, İzmir Ekonomi University, Turkey

Cara Williams, Emirates College For Advanced Education, United Arab Emirates

Chandra Pratama Syaima, Lampung University, Indonesia

Chris Plyley, University of the Virgin Islands, Virgin Islands

Claudiu Mereuta, Dunarea De Jos University of Galati, Romania

El Takach Suzanne, Lebanese University, Lebanon

Farouk Bouhadiba, University of Oran 2, Algeria

Hakan Akçay, Yıldız Teknik University, Turkey

Irena Markovska, Assen Zlatarov University, Bulgaria

Irina Andreeva, Peter The Great St. Petersburg Polytechnic University (SPBPU), Russia

Iwona Bodys-Cupak, Jagiellonian University, Poland

Jaya Bishnu Pradhan, Tribhuvan University, Nepal

Kassa Mickael, Addis Ababa University, Ethiopia

Kemmanat Mingsiritham, Sukhothai Thammathirat Open University, Thailand

Mehtap Yildirim, Marmara University, Turkey

Milan Kubiatko, University of Zilina, Slovakia

Munise Handan Güneş, Ondokuz Mayıs University, Turkey

Mustafa Koç, Süleyman Demirel University, Turkey

Oguz Akturk, Necmettin Erbakan University, Turkey

Philomina Ifeanyi Onwuka, Delta State University, Nigeria

Selahattin Alan, Selçuk University, Turkey

Sharif Abu Karsh, Arab American University, Palestine

Shenglei Pi, Guangzhou University, China

Siew Nyet Moi, Universiti Malaysia Sabah, Malaysia

Sinan Erten, Hacettepe University, Turkey

Sindorela Doli Kryeziu, University of Gjakova, Albania

Tryfon Mavropalias, University of Western Macedonia, Greece

Volodymyr Sulyma, Dnipropetrovsk Medical Academy, Ukraine

 

Publication Ethics and Malpractice Statement

The Science, Education, Art and Technology Journal (SEAT Journal)’s Publication Ethics and Publication Malpractice Statement is based, in large part, on the guidelines and standards developed by the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE). The relevant duties and expectations of authors, reviewers, and editors of the journal are set out below.

 

Responsibilities of Authors

 

By submitting a manuscript to Science, Education, Art and Technology Journal (SEAT Journal), the author(s) warrant that the manuscript is their own, original work and that it has neither been published previously nor is currently being considered for publication elsewhere. They also warrant that the sources of any ideas and/or words in the manuscript that are not their own have been properly attributed through appropriate citations and/or quotes.

 

An author should not normally publish manuscripts describing essentially the same research in multiple journals or publication venues. Such redundant publication is generally considered to constitute unethical publishing behavior, and if discovered may result in a manuscript under consideration being rejected, or a published article being retracted.

 

Authors of manuscripts reporting on original research should present an accurate account of the work performed, accompanied by an objective discussion of its significance. Underlying data should be represented accurately in the manuscript. The manuscript should contain sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the work. The fabrication of results and the making of fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behavior and may be cause for rejection or retraction of a manuscript or published article.

 

Where the manuscript reports on commercial software, hardware, or other products, authors must include a declaration at the beginning of the manuscript in which they must either state that no conflict of interest exists or describe the nature of any potential conflict. All sources of financial support for the research should also be disclosed in the manuscript.

 

The author(s) of a manuscript agree that if the manuscript is accepted for publication in the Science, Education, Art and Technology Journal (SEAT Journal), the published article will be copyrighted using a Creative Commons “Attribution 4.0 International” license. This license allows others to freely copy, distribute, and display the copyrighted work, and derivative works based upon it, under certain specified conditions.

 

Authors are responsible for obtaining written permission to include any images or artwork for which they do not hold copyright in their articles, or to adapt any such images or artwork for inclusion in their articles. The copyright holder must be made explicitly aware that the image(s) or artwork will be made freely available online as part of the article under a Creative Commons “Attribution 4.0 International” license.

 

The authors’ names should be listed on the article in order of their contribution to the article, and all authors take responsibility for their own contributions. Only those individuals who have made a substantive contribution should be listed as authors; those whose contributions are indirect or marginal (e.g., colleagues or supervisors who have reviewed drafts of the work or provided proofreading assistance, and heads of research institutes/centers/labs) should be named in an “Acknowledgments” section at the end of the article, immediately preceding the Reference List. The corresponding author must ensure that all appropriate co-authors and no inappropriate co-authors are included on the article, and that all listed co-authors have seen and approved the final version of the article and agreed to its publication.

 

Where an author discovers a significant error or inaccuracy in an article of his/hers that has been published in the Science, Education, Art and Technology Journal (SEAT Journal), he/she has an obligation to promptly notify the editors and cooperate with them to correct the article or retract it as appropriate.

 

Responsibilities of Reviewers

 

The Science, Education, Art and Technology Journal (SEAT Journal)’s reviewers perform work for the journal on a volunteer basis. Given that most of these individuals are in full-time employment, their reviewing activities for the Science, Education, Art and Technology Journal (SEAT Journal) must, by necessity, not be their top priority. Reviewers are free to decline invitations to review particular manuscripts at their discretion, for example, if their current employment workload and/or other commitments make it prohibitive for them to complete a review in a timely fashion and to do justice to the task in the available time frame. They should also not accept manuscript review assignments for which they feel unqualified.

 

Reviewers who have accepted manuscript assignments are normally expected to submit their reviews within one month. They should recuse themselves from the assignment if it becomes apparent to them at any stage that they do not possess the required expertise to perform the review, or that they may have a potential conflict of interest in performing the review (e.g., one resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, institutions, or companies associated with the manuscript).

 

Privileged information or ideas obtained by reviewers through the peer review process must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents, and must not be shown to or discussed with others except as authorized by the Science, Education, Art and Technology Journal (SEAT Journal) Editor.

 

When conducting their reviews, reviewers are asked to do so as objectively as possible, refraining from engaging in personal criticism of the author(s). They are encouraged to express their views clearly, explaining and justifying all recommendations made. They should always attempt to provide detailed and constructive feedback to assist the author(s) in improving their work, even if the manuscript is, in their opinion, not publishable.

 

Reviewers should identify in their reviews relevant published work that has not been cited by the author(s), together with any instances in which proper attribution of sources has not been provided. They should call to the responsible editor’s attention any major resemblances between a manuscript under consideration and other published articles or papers of which they are aware, as well as any concerns they might have in relation to the ethical acceptability of the research reported in the manuscript.

 

Responsibilities of Editors

 

The Science, Education, Art and Technology Journal (SEAT Journal) has ultimate responsibility for deciding if a manuscript submitted to the Science, Education, Art and Technology Journal (SEAT Journal) should be published, and in doing so is guided by the journal’s policies as determined by the Science, Education, Art and Technology Journal (SEAT Journal) editorial board and constrained by such legal requirements as shall then be in force regarding libel, copyright infringement, and plagiarism. The Editor may consult with the Associate Editor and other members of the editorial team, as well as with reviewers, in making publication decisions.

 

The editors will evaluate manuscripts for their intellectual content without regard to the race, color, gender, sexual orientation, religious beliefs, ethnic origin, citizenship, or political philosophy of the author(s). They will not disclose any information about a manuscript under consideration to anyone other than the author(s), reviewers and potential reviewers, and in some instances the Science, Education, Art and Technology Journal (SEAT Journal) editorial board members, as appropriate. Additionally, the editors will make every effort to ensure the integrity of the blind review process by not revealing the identity of the author(s) of a manuscript to the reviewers of that manuscript, and vice versa.

 

When evaluating a manuscript for publication, in addition to considering standard criteria pertaining to the rigor of the manuscript, the quality of its presentation, and its contribution to humanity’s stock of knowledge, the editors will also seek evidence that ethical harms have been minimized in the conduct of the reported research. They will question whether the benefits outweigh the harms in the particular study’s case. Since the Science, Education, Art and Technology Journal (SEAT Journal) welcomes the submission of manuscripts from any country, it is necessary to recognize that laws and regulations regarding research ethics and ethical approval vary worldwide. As such, the editors may need to seek clarification in this regard with the author(s) and request that they supply a letter from the relevant institutional ethics committee or board that approved the research.

 

The editors will be guided by CORE’s Guidelines for Retracting Articles when considering retracting, issuing an expression of concern about, and issuing corrections pertaining to articles that have been published in the Science, Education, Art and Technology Journal (SEAT Journal). They are committed to working closely with research organizations and institutions in line with CORE’s advice on Cooperation between Research Institutions and Journals on Research Integrity Cases.

 

 

Dizinler ve Platformlar